Attorney Grievance Commission v. Joe

885 A.2d 339, 389 Md. 331, 2005 Md. LEXIS 642
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 1, 2005·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 54·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 1st day of November, 2005

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Isaac Joe, Jr., be, and is hereby, reprimanded for his violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4 and 8.1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Joe, 885 A.2d 339, 389 Md. 331, 2005 Md. LEXIS 642 (Md. 2005).

885 A.2d 339 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Joe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.