Attorney Grievance Commission v. Joe

885 A.2d 339, 389 Md. 331, 2005 Md. LEXIS 642
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 1, 2005
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 54
StatusPublished

This text of 885 A.2d 339 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Joe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Joe, 885 A.2d 339, 389 Md. 331, 2005 Md. LEXIS 642 (Md. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 1st day of November, 2005

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Isaac Joe, Jr., be, and is hereby, reprimanded for his violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4 and 8.1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
885 A.2d 339, 389 Md. 331, 2005 Md. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-joe-md-2005.