Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge

917 A.2d 702, 397 Md. 349, 2007 Md. LEXIS 81

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 6, 2007·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 67·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 6th day of March, 2007,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, John O. Iweanoge, Jr., be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 3.4(c), 5.3(a), (b), and (c)(1), 5.5(a)(2), and 8.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 6th day of March, 2007,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, John O. Iweanoge, Jr., be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 3.4(c), 5.3(a), (b), and (c)(1), 5.5(a)(2), and 8.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge, 917 A.2d 702, 397 Md. 349, 2007 Md. LEXIS 81 (Md. 2007).

Pincite

917 A.2d 702 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.