Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge

894 A.2d 1135, 391 Md. 686, 2006 Md. LEXIS 168

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 22, 2006·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 21·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 22nd day of March, 2006

ORDERED, that the Respondent, JOHN O. IWEANOGE, JR., be, and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 22nd day of March, 2006

ORDERED, that the Respondent, JOHN O. IWEANOGE, JR., be, and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge, 894 A.2d 1135, 391 Md. 686, 2006 Md. LEXIS 168 (Md. 2006).

Pincite

894 A.2d 1135 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.