Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge

894 A.2d 1135, 391 Md. 686, 2006 Md. LEXIS 168

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMarch 22, 2006

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 21

StatusPublished

This text of 894 A.2d 1135 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Iweanoge, 894 A.2d 1135, 391 Md. 686, 2006 Md. LEXIS 168 (Md. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 22nd day of March, 2006

ORDERED, that the Respondent, JOHN O. IWEANOGE, JR., be, and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 22nd day of March, 2006

ORDERED, that the Respondent, JOHN O. IWEANOGE, JR., be, and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

894 A.2d 1135, 391 Md. 686, 2006 Md. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-iweanoge-md-2006.