Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hornig

852 A.2d 97, 381 Md. 706
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 16, 2004
DocketMisc. AG No. 58
StatusPublished

This text of 852 A.2d 97 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hornig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hornig, 852 A.2d 97, 381 Md. 706 (Md. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

RAKER, J.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Ninety-Day Suspension of Respondent By Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 16th day of June, 2004,

[707]*707ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Craig J. Hornig be, and he hereby is, suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of ninety (90) days, commencing July 1, 2004; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Craig J. Hornig from the register of attorneys in this Court, effective July 1, 2004, until further Order of this Court and shall certify to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State that the name of Craig J. Hornig has been so stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 A.2d 97, 381 Md. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-hornig-md-2004.