Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holzman

691 A.2d 1368, 345 Md. 348, 1997 Md. LEXIS 96
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 10, 1997
DocketMisc. Docket AG, No. 8
StatusPublished

This text of 691 A.2d 1368 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holzman, 691 A.2d 1368, 345 Md. 348, 1997 Md. LEXIS 96 (Md. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the Joint Petition by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Harvey Holzman, Respondent, in which Respondent consents to be placed on inactive status by the Court, it is this 10th day of April, 1997.

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Petition to be placed on inactive status from the practice of law be, and it is hereby granted, and that Harvey Holzman, be placed on inactive status until such time as he is able to demonstrate that he has been restored to good health and capable of engaging in the competent practice of law, and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Harvey Holzman from the register of attorneys in this Court until further order of this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and [349]*349the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-713.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 A.2d 1368, 345 Md. 348, 1997 Md. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-holzman-md-1997.