Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holt

5 A.3d 694, 416 Md. 92, 2010 Md. LEXIS 536

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedOctober 5, 2010

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 40

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.3d 694 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holt, 5 A.3d 694, 416 Md. 92, 2010 Md. LEXIS 536 (Md. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 5th day of October, 2010,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Carolyn Marie Holt, be, and she is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately, with the right to reapply after completion of her disciplinary probation in Florida, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Carolyn Marie Holt from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 5th day of October, 2010,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Carolyn Marie Holt, be, and she is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately, with the right to reapply after completion of her disciplinary probation in Florida, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Carolyn Marie Holt from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.3d 694, 416 Md. 92, 2010 Md. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-holt-md-2010.