Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hickey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hickey

61 A.3d 767, 430 Md. 430, 2013 WL 693213, 2013 Md. LEXIS 130

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 27, 2013·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 40·Published

Opinion

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the parties’ Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 27th day of February, 2013

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, William F. Hickey, III, be, and he is hereby disbarred by consent, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall immediately strike the name of William F. Hickey, III, from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the parties’ Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 27th day of February, 2013

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, William F. Hickey, III, be, and he is hereby disbarred by consent, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall immediately strike the name of William F. Hickey, III, from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hickey, 61 A.3d 767, 430 Md. 430, 2013 WL 693213, 2013 Md. LEXIS 130 (Md. 2013).

Pincite

61 A.3d 767 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hickey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.