Attorney Grievance Commission v. Havens

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Havens

772 A.2d 868, 364 Md. 265, 2001 Md. LEXIS 464

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 25, 2001·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 70·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Public Reprimand submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Keith R. Havens, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 25th day of May, 2001,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Keith R. Havens, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for his violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 3.4(d), and 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct in connection with his representation of Evans Jay Francis and Auspex Associates, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Public Reprimand submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Keith R. Havens, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 25th day of May, 2001,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Keith R. Havens, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for his violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 3.4(d), and 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct in connection with his representation of Evans Jay Francis and Auspex Associates, Inc.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Havens, 772 A.2d 868, 364 Md. 265, 2001 Md. LEXIS 464 (Md. 2001).

Pincite

772 A.2d 868 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Havens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related