Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg

723 A.2d 20, 352 Md. 495, 1999 Md. LEXIS 319

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 20, 1999·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 75·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and James M. Goldberg, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 20th day of January, 1999,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, James M. Goldberg, be and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and James M. Goldberg, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 20th day of January, 1999,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, James M. Goldberg, be and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15(a).

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg, 723 A.2d 20, 352 Md. 495, 1999 Md. LEXIS 319 (Md. 1999).

Pincite

723 A.2d 20 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.