Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg

723 A.2d 20, 352 Md. 495, 1999 Md. LEXIS 319

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJanuary 20, 1999

DocketMisc. Docket AG, No. 75

StatusPublished

This text of 723 A.2d 20 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg, 723 A.2d 20, 352 Md. 495, 1999 Md. LEXIS 319 (Md. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and James M. Goldberg, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 20th day of January, 1999,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, James M. Goldberg, be and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and James M. Goldberg, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 20th day of January, 1999,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, James M. Goldberg, be and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15(a).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 A.2d 20, 352 Md. 495, 1999 Md. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-goldberg-md-1999.