Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gitomer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gitomer

49 A.3d 333, 427 Md. 519

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 1, 2012·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 32·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 1st day of August, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Mark Lawrence Gitomer is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Mark Lawrence Gitomer from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 1st day of August, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Mark Lawrence Gitomer is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Mark Lawrence Gitomer from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gitomer, 49 A.3d 333, 427 Md. 519 (Md. 2012).

Pincite

49 A.3d 333 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gitomer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.