Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gilbert

717 A.2d 388, 351 Md. 159, 1998 Md. LEXIS 733

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedSeptember 11, 1998

DocketMisc. Docket AG, No. 17

StatusPublished

This text of 717 A.2d 388 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gilbert, 717 A.2d 388, 351 Md. 159, 1998 Md. LEXIS 733 (Md. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 16-716 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, the Attorney Grievance Commission petitioned the Court for the suspension of the respondent, Bruce Scott Gilbert, from the practice of law in this State as a result of the respondent’s conviction for violation of Md.Code (1996 Repl.Vol.), Art. 27, Sec. 287 (possession of cocaine) in the Circuit Court for Washington County.

After the respondent, in response to a show cause order, filed an answer in opposition to the petition, the Court held a hearing. Upon careful consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties, it is this 11th day of September, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition to suspend attorney be, and it is hereby, DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 16-716 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, the Attorney Grievance Commission petitioned the Court for the suspension of the respondent, Bruce Scott Gilbert, from the practice of law in this State as a result of the respondent’s conviction for violation of Md.Code (1996 Repl.Vol.), Art. 27, Sec. 287 (possession of cocaine) in the Circuit Court for Washington County.

After the respondent, in response to a show cause order, filed an answer in opposition to the petition, the Court held a hearing. Upon careful consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties, it is this 11th day of September, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition to suspend attorney be, and it is hereby, DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 A.2d 388, 351 Md. 159, 1998 Md. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-gilbert-md-1998.