Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garrett
970 A.2d 891, 408 Md. 485, 2009 Md. LEXIS 54
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 4, 2009·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 50·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. [486]*486Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 4th day of May, 2009,
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Dwayne L. Garrett, be,' and is hereby, reprimanded for violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 8.1(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garrett, 970 A.2d 891, 408 Md. 485, 2009 Md. LEXIS 54 (Md. 2009).
970 A.2d 891 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Garrett
970 A.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)