Attorney Grievance Commission v. Friedman

64 A.3d 494, 431 Md. 217, 2013 WL 1693991, 2013 Md. LEXIS 215
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 19, 2013
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 12
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 A.3d 494 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Friedman, 64 A.3d 494, 431 Md. 217, 2013 WL 1693991, 2013 Md. LEXIS 215 (Md. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Mark Howard Friedman, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law. The Court having considered this Petition, it is this 19th day of April, 2013.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that Respondent, Mark Howard Friedman, be and he is hereby [218]*218disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Mark Howard Friedman from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Friedman
75 A.3d 911 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.3d 494, 431 Md. 217, 2013 WL 1693991, 2013 Md. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-friedman-md-2013.