Attorney Grievance Commission v. Frame

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Frame

799 A.2d 396, 369 Md. 255

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 29, 2002·No. Misc. AG No. 1·Published

Opinion

ORDER

ELDRIDGE, J.

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. [256] Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 29th day of May, 2002,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Vernon G. Frame, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded; and it is further,

ORDERED, that Respondent shall file for inactive status with the Clients’ Security Trust Fund of the Bar of Maryland to be known as Client Protection Fund of Maryland as of July 1, 2002 and shall provide proof of inactive status to the Office of Bar Counsel within thirty (30) days of filing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

ELDRIDGE, J.

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. [256] Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 29th day of May, 2002,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Vernon G. Frame, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded; and it is further,

ORDERED, that Respondent shall file for inactive status with the Clients’ Security Trust Fund of the Bar of Maryland to be known as Client Protection Fund of Maryland as of July 1, 2002 and shall provide proof of inactive status to the Office of Bar Counsel within thirty (30) days of filing.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Frame, 799 A.2d 396, 369 Md. 255 (Md. 2002).

Pincite

799 A.2d 396 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Frame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.