Attorney Grievance Commission v. Floam

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Floam

115 A.3d 1262, 443 Md. 231, 2015 Md. LEXIS 408

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 9, 2015·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 0006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 9th day of June, 2015,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Steven Scott Floam, Respondent in the captioned disciplinary proceeding, is hereby reprimanded for violating Rule 8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 9th day of June, 2015,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Steven Scott Floam, Respondent in the captioned disciplinary proceeding, is hereby reprimanded for violating Rule 8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Floam, 115 A.3d 1262, 443 Md. 231, 2015 Md. LEXIS 408 (Md. 2015).

Pincite

115 A.3d 1262 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Floam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.