Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fitzgerald

858 A.2d 496, 383 Md. 238, 2004 Md. LEXIS 603

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 22, 2004·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 9·Published

Opinion

ORDER

IRMA S. RAKER, Judge.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 22nd day of September, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Judith Lenore Fitzgerald be, and is hereby, disbarred by [239] consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Judith Lenore Fitzgerald from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

IRMA S. RAKER, Judge.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 22nd day of September, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Judith Lenore Fitzgerald be, and is hereby, disbarred by [239] consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Judith Lenore Fitzgerald from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fitzgerald, 858 A.2d 496, 383 Md. 238, 2004 Md. LEXIS 603 (Md. 2004).

Pincite

858 A.2d 496 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.