Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eldridge

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eldridge

849 A.2d 1026, 381 Md. 475, 2004 Md. LEXIS 257

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMay 19, 2004

DocketMisc. AG No. 72

StatusPublished

This text of 849 A.2d 1026 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eldridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eldridge, 849 A.2d 1026, 381 Md. 475, 2004 Md. LEXIS 257 (Md. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

IRMA S. RAKER, Judge.

This matter came on upon the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. The Court having considered the Joint Petition, it is this 19th day of May, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that Robert Whiting Eldridge be, and is hereby disbarred by consent, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Robert Whiting Eldridge from the register of attorneys and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

IRMA S. RAKER, Judge.

This matter came on upon the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. The Court having considered the Joint Petition, it is this 19th day of May, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that Robert Whiting Eldridge be, and is hereby disbarred by consent, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Robert Whiting Eldridge from the register of attorneys and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

849 A.2d 1026, 381 Md. 475, 2004 Md. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-eldridge-md-2004.