Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eide

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eide

136 A.3d 413, 447 Md. 588, 2016 WL 2930693, 2016 Md. LEXIS 281

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 18, 2016·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 61·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 18th day of May 2016,

ORDERED, that Respondent, Peter Jerome Eide, be and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rule 5.5(a) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 18th day of May 2016,

ORDERED, that Respondent, Peter Jerome Eide, be and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rule 5.5(a) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eide, 136 A.3d 413, 447 Md. 588, 2016 WL 2930693, 2016 Md. LEXIS 281 (Md. 2016).

Pincite

136 A.3d 413 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Eide) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.