Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dimas

101 A.3d 1062, 440 Md. 224, 2014 Md. LEXIS 712
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 21, 2014
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 43
StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.3d 1062 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dimas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dimas, 101 A.3d 1062, 440 Md. 224, 2014 Md. LEXIS 712 (Md. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent admits she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rule 1.15 and 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 21st day of October, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Marilyn D. Dimas, be and she is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED, that, forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Marilyn D. Dimas from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.3d 1062, 440 Md. 224, 2014 Md. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-dimas-md-2014.