Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cuadra

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cuadra

78 A.3d 344, 435 Md. 324

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedOctober 21, 2013

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 22

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.3d 344 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cuadra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cuadra, 78 A.3d 344, 435 Md. 324 (Md. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 21st day of October, 2013,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Tabatha Karina Cuadra, Respondent, is hereby reprimanded for professional misconduct in violation of Rules 7.1(a) and 8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct and Md.Code Ann., Bus. Occ. & Prof. § 10.605.2(d), (e) and (h).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 21st day of October, 2013,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Tabatha Karina Cuadra, Respondent, is hereby reprimanded for professional misconduct in violation of Rules 7.1(a) and 8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct and Md.Code Ann., Bus. Occ. & Prof. § 10.605.2(d), (e) and (h).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.3d 344, 435 Md. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-cuadra-md-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack