Attorney Grievance Commission v. Corrigan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Corrigan

541 A.2d 170, 312 Md. 548, 1988 Md. LEXIS 112

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 13, 1988·No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 4·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the consent to disbarment filed by James Francis Corrigan in accordance with Maryland Rule BV12 d 2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 13th day of May, 1988,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that James Francis Corrigan be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of James Francis Corrigan from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the consent to disbarment filed by James Francis Corrigan in accordance with Maryland Rule BV12 d 2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 13th day of May, 1988,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that James Francis Corrigan be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of James Francis Corrigan from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Corrigan, 541 A.2d 170, 312 Md. 548, 1988 Md. LEXIS 112 (Md. 1988).

Pincite

541 A.2d 170 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Corrigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.