Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chasnoff

854 A.2d 876, 382 Md. 60, 2004 Md. LEXIS 492
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 22, 2004
DocketMisc. AG No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 854 A.2d 876 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chasnoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chasnoff, 854 A.2d 876, 382 Md. 60, 2004 Md. LEXIS 492 (Md. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

RAKER, J.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 22nd day of July, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Joel Chasnoff, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joel Chasnoff from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
854 A.2d 876, 382 Md. 60, 2004 Md. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-chasnoff-md-2004.