Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chasnoff

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chasnoff

854 A.2d 876, 382 Md. 60, 2004 Md. LEXIS 492

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 22, 2004·No. Misc. AG No. 2·Published

Opinion

ORDER

RAKER, J.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 22nd day of July, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Joel Chasnoff, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joel Chasnoff from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

RAKER, J.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 22nd day of July, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Joel Chasnoff, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joel Chasnoff from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chasnoff, 854 A.2d 876, 382 Md. 60, 2004 Md. LEXIS 492 (Md. 2004).

Pincite

854 A.2d 876 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chasnoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.