Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chang

93 A.3d 286, 438 Md. 737, 2014 WL 2558401, 2014 Md. LEXIS 363
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 6, 2014
Docket4ag/14
StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.3d 286 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chang, 93 A.3d 286, 438 Md. 737, 2014 WL 2558401, 2014 Md. LEXIS 363 (Md. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter, having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action and request for interim suspension pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(d), with *738 attached certified copy of the Order of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals dated January 23, 2014, whereby that Court suspended Sandy Yeh Chang, Respondent, from the practice of law in D.C. for two (2) years, and it appearing that Respondent Sandy Yeh Chang is also a member of the Bar of this Court; it is this 6th day of June, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Sandy Yeh Chang, be, and he is hereby, suspended, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(d); and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Sandy Yeh Chang, from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.3d 286, 438 Md. 737, 2014 WL 2558401, 2014 Md. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-chang-md-2014.