Attorney Grievance Commission v. Carnot

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Carnot

810 A.2d 938, 371 Md. 575, 2002 Md. LEXIS 865

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 7, 2002

DocketMisc. Docket AG, No. 79

StatusPublished

This text of 810 A.2d 938 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Carnot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Carnot, 810 A.2d 938, 371 Md. 575, 2002 Md. LEXIS 865 (Md. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 7th day of November, 2002

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Kimberly Hope Carnot be, and she is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that Kimberly Hope Carnot, shall not be eligible to petition this Court for reinstatement pursuant to Rule [576]*57616-781 until such time as the Dean of Vermont Law School may reinstate Ms. Carnot’s Juris Doctor degree from Vermont Law School; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the •name of Kimberly Hope Carnot from the register of attorneys in this Court and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 7th day of November, 2002

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Kimberly Hope Carnot be, and she is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that Kimberly Hope Carnot, shall not be eligible to petition this Court for reinstatement pursuant to Rule [576]*57616-781 until such time as the Dean of Vermont Law School may reinstate Ms. Carnot’s Juris Doctor degree from Vermont Law School; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the •name of Kimberly Hope Carnot from the register of attorneys in this Court and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

810 A.2d 938, 371 Md. 575, 2002 Md. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-carnot-md-2002.