Attorney Grievance Commission v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Byrd

810 A.2d 424, 371 Md. 454, 2002 Md. LEXIS 1091

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 1, 2002

DocketMisc. AG No. 75

StatusPublished

This text of 810 A.2d 424 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Byrd, 810 A.2d 424, 371 Md. 454, 2002 Md. LEXIS 1091 (Md. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the joint petition of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Toby N. Byrd, Esquire, through counsel, Bruce L. Marcus, Esquire, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of ninety (90) days, commencing November 1, 2002, it is this 1st day of November 2002,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the joint petition be and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Toby N. Byrd is suspended from the practice of law from the State of Maryland for a period of ninety (90) days, the suspension to commence November 1, 2002; and it is further

ORDERED, that prior to his reinstatement, the Respondent shall enroll in and complete a legal ethics course offered through the Maryland Institute for Professional Education of Lawyers, Inc. or its equivalent and waive any right, title or interest in and to any additional claims which he may have involving Catherine E. Meads; and it is further

ORDERED, that on November 1, 2002, the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Toby N. Byrd from the register of attorneys and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having considered the joint petition of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Toby N. Byrd, Esquire, through counsel, Bruce L. Marcus, Esquire, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of ninety (90) days, commencing November 1, 2002, it is this 1st day of November 2002,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the joint petition be and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Toby N. Byrd is suspended from the practice of law from the State of Maryland for a period of ninety (90) days, the suspension to commence November 1, 2002; and it is further

ORDERED, that prior to his reinstatement, the Respondent shall enroll in and complete a legal ethics course offered through the Maryland Institute for Professional Education of Lawyers, Inc. or its equivalent and waive any right, title or interest in and to any additional claims which he may have involving Catherine E. Meads; and it is further

ORDERED, that on November 1, 2002, the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Toby N. Byrd from the register of attorneys and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

810 A.2d 424, 371 Md. 454, 2002 Md. LEXIS 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-byrd-md-2002.