Attorney Grievance Commission v. Broida

104 A.3d 898, 441 Md. 1
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 15, 2014
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 71
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 A.3d 898 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Broida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Broida, 104 A.3d 898, 441 Md. 1 (Md. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent admits he violated Rule 8.1(a) and Rule 8.4(a)-(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 15th day of December, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Charles Jeffrey Broida, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Charles Jeffrey Broida from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Broida
113 A.3d 1086 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
In re: Charles J. Broida
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.3d 898, 441 Md. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-broida-md-2014.