Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bowytz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bowytz

868 A.2d 263, 385 Md. 280, 2005 Md. LEXIS 47

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 15, 2005·No. Misc. AG No. 76·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent, Robert B. Bowytz, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 15th day of February, 2005,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals that the Respondent, Robert B. Bowytz, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent, Robert B. Bowytz, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 15th day of February, 2005,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals that the Respondent, Robert B. Bowytz, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(d).

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bowytz, 868 A.2d 263, 385 Md. 280, 2005 Md. LEXIS 47 (Md. 2005).

Pincite

868 A.2d 263 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bowytz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.