Attorney Grievance Commission v. Borotka

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Borotka

640 A.2d 1085, 334 Md. 537

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMay 6, 1994

DocketMisc. Docket (subtitle BV) No. 4

StatusPublished

This text of 640 A.2d 1085 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Borotka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Borotka, 640 A.2d 1085, 334 Md. 537 (Md. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Placement on Inactive Status submitted to this Court by Petitioner and Respondent, it is this 6th day of May, 1994

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby, granted and Leonard Peter Borotka is immediately placed on inactive status subject to further order of this Court, and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Leonard Peter Borotka from the register of attorneys in this Court until further order of this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule BV13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Placement on Inactive Status submitted to this Court by Petitioner and Respondent, it is this 6th day of May, 1994

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby, granted and Leonard Peter Borotka is immediately placed on inactive status subject to further order of this Court, and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Leonard Peter Borotka from the register of attorneys in this Court until further order of this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule BV13.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

640 A.2d 1085, 334 Md. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-borotka-md-1994.