Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum

864 A.2d 191, 384 Md. 483, 2004 Md. LEXIS 800

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 23, 2004·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 66·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 23rd day of December, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Stuart M. Blum, be, and is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Stuart M. Blum from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 23rd day of December, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Stuart M. Blum, be, and is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Stuart M. Blum from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum, 864 A.2d 191, 384 Md. 483, 2004 Md. LEXIS 800 (Md. 2004).

Pincite

864 A.2d 191 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related