Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum

864 A.2d 191, 384 Md. 483, 2004 Md. LEXIS 800
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 23, 2004
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 66
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 864 A.2d 191 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum, 864 A.2d 191, 384 Md. 483, 2004 Md. LEXIS 800 (Md. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 23rd day of December, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Stuart M. Blum, be, and is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Stuart M. Blum from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teofila H. Mocny v. Ronald G. Mocny
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2024
St. Cyr v. St. Cyr
137 A.3d 332 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2016)
Altman v. Altman
181 S.W.3d 676 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 A.2d 191, 384 Md. 483, 2004 Md. LEXIS 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-blum-md-2004.