Attorney Grievance Commission v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Baldwin

401 A.2d 480, 285 Md. 208, 1979 Md. LEXIS 217

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMay 25, 1979

DocketMisc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 31

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 401 A.2d 480 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Baldwin, 401 A.2d 480, 285 Md. 208, 1979 Md. LEXIS 217 (Md. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the findings of fact and no exceptions having been filed, it is this 25th day of May, 1979

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Maurice Whiteford Baldwin, Sr., be, and he is hereby, reprimanded, and it is assumed that Bar Counsel will bring to the Court’s attention if the estate involved in this proceeding is not promptly closed; and it is further

ORDERED that Baldwin shall pay the transcript costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having considered the findings of fact and no exceptions having been filed, it is this 25th day of May, 1979

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Maurice Whiteford Baldwin, Sr., be, and he is hereby, reprimanded, and it is assumed that Bar Counsel will bring to the Court’s attention if the estate involved in this proceeding is not promptly closed; and it is further

ORDERED that Baldwin shall pay the transcript costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

401 A.2d 480, 285 Md. 208, 1979 Md. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-baldwin-md-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack