Attorney Grievance Commission v. Artis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Artis

910 A.2d 1060, 395 Md. 419, 2006 Md. LEXIS 713

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 6, 2006

DocketMisc. AG No. 28

StatusPublished

This text of 910 A.2d 1060 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Artis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Artis, 910 A.2d 1060, 395 Md. 419, 2006 Md. LEXIS 713 (Md. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed herein, the Petitioner’s response to this Court’s Order to Show Cause of August 8, 2006, and the Respondent’s failure to respond to said Show Cause Order, it is this 6th day of November, 2006

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Paris A. Artis, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Maryland with his reinstatement conditioned upon his reinstatement to the Bar of the District of Columbia. It is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Paris A. Artis from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed herein, the Petitioner’s response to this Court’s Order to Show Cause of August 8, 2006, and the Respondent’s failure to respond to said Show Cause Order, it is this 6th day of November, 2006

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Paris A. Artis, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Maryland with his reinstatement conditioned upon his reinstatement to the Bar of the District of Columbia. It is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Paris A. Artis from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

910 A.2d 1060, 395 Md. 419, 2006 Md. LEXIS 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-artis-md-2006.