Attorney Grievance Commission v. Amos

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Amos

104 A.3d 899, 441 Md. 3, 2014 Md. LEXIS 868

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedDecember 17, 2014

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 46

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.3d 899 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Amos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Amos, 104 A.3d 899, 441 Md. 3, 2014 Md. LEXIS 868 (Md. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action and the responses of Bar Counsel and Respondent to the Show Cause Order issued September 29, 2014 filed in the above entitled case, it is this 17th day of December, 2014

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that Respondent, Esthus Christopher Amos, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland pursuant to Rule 16-778(c); and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Esthus Christopher Amos from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-760(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action and the responses of Bar Counsel and Respondent to the Show Cause Order issued September 29, 2014 filed in the above entitled case, it is this 17th day of December, 2014

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that Respondent, Esthus Christopher Amos, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland pursuant to Rule 16-778(c); and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Esthus Christopher Amos from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-760(e).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.3d 899, 441 Md. 3, 2014 Md. LEXIS 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-amos-md-2014.