Attorney Grievance Commission v. Amos

688 A.2d 444, 344 Md. 565, 1997 Md. LEXIS 736
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 6, 1997
DocketMisc. (Subtitle BV), No. 64
StatusPublished

This text of 688 A.2d 444 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Amos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Amos, 688 A.2d 444, 344 Md. 565, 1997 Md. LEXIS 736 (Md. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, William E. Amos, Jr., to place the Respondent on suspension for a period of six (6) months.

The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 6th day of February, 1997,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, William E. Amos, Jr., be, and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of six (6) months, effective immediately; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, as a condition of his reinstatement, shall provide verification to Bar Counsel, in connection with the client matters involving Lawrence London, Robert Barton and Bowden Hires, Jr., that he has agreed to submit to some form of fee dispute arbitration in any of those matters where the client requests such arbitration; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of William E. Amos, Jr., from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Rule 16-713.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 A.2d 444, 344 Md. 565, 1997 Md. LEXIS 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-amos-md-1997.