Attorney Grievance Commission v. Agatstein

44 A.3d 420, 426 Md. 425, 2012 WL 1608582, 2012 Md. LEXIS 267
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 9, 2012
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 96
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 A.3d 420 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Agatstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Agatstein, 44 A.3d 420, 426 Md. 425, 2012 WL 1608582, 2012 Md. LEXIS 267 (Md. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respon[426]*426dent, David Agatstein, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered this Petition, it is this 9th day of May, 2012.

ORDERED, that Respondent, David Agatstein, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Agatstein from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. AGATSTEIN
44 A.3d 420 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.3d 420, 426 Md. 425, 2012 WL 1608582, 2012 Md. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-agatstein-md-2012.