Attorney Grievance Comm. v. BORNHORST

20 A.3d 104, 419 Md. 629
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 19, 2011
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 91, Sept. Term 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.3d 104 (Attorney Grievance Comm. v. BORNHORST) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm. v. BORNHORST, 20 A.3d 104, 419 Md. 629 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

20 A.3d 104 (2011)
419 Md. 629

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Thomas H. BORNHORST, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 91, Sept. Term 2010.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 19, 2011.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 19th day of May, 2011,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Thomas H. Bornhorst, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Thomas H. Bornhorst from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland *105 and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bornhorst
20 A.3d 104 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.3d 104, 419 Md. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-comm-v-bornhorst-md-2011.