Attorney Grievance Comm v. Attorney Discipline Bd

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 2016·No. 153046·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

153046 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

v SC: 153046 ADB: 15-000082-GA;

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, 15-000088-GA Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation agreeing to the dismissal of the complaint for superintending control is considered, and the complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice and without costs to any party.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2016

a0906

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm v. Attorney Discipline Bd, (Mich. 2016).

Attorney Grievance Comm v. Attorney Discipline Bd (Attorney Grievance Comm v. Attorney Discipline Bd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.