Attorney Grievace v. Litchfield
This text of Attorney Grievace v. Litchfield (Attorney Grievace v. Litchfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner * * Misc. Docket AG V. * No. 49 * September Term, 2016 AMBER ICAYE LITCHFIELD * * Respondent * * ***********************************************
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient evidence
exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.3,
1.4(a)(2)-(3), 1.15(a) & (d), 4.1, 8.1(b) and 8.4(a)(b)(c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules
of Professional Conduct in effect at the time of the misconduct, it is this 7th day of
October ,20I6,
ORDERED, that Amber Kaye Litchfield, Respondent, is hereby disbarred by consent
from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Amber Kaye Litchfield
from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in
accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(1)3 and comply with the notice provisions set forth in
Maryland Rule 19-761(b).
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievace v. Litchfield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievace-v-litchfield-md-2016.