Attorney General v. Philip Morris USA
742 N.W.2d 118, 480 Mich. 990
This text of 742 N.W.2d 118 (Attorney General v. Philip Morris USA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Attorney General v. Philip Morris USA, 742 N.W.2d 118, 480 Mich. 990 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PHILIP MORRIS USA, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Lorillard Tobacco Company, Anderson Tobacco Company, L.L.C., Bekenton USA, Canary Island Cigar Company, Chancellor Tobacco Company, P.L.C., Commonwealth Brands, Inc., Compania Industrial De Tabacos Monte Pas S.A., Daughters and Ryan, Inc., Farmers Tobacco Company, General Tobacco, House of Prince A/S, International Tobacco Group (Las Vegas), Inc., Japan Tobacco International USA, Inc., King Maker Marketing, Inc., Konci G & D International USA, Inc., King Maker Marketing, Inc., Konci G & D Management, Kretek International, Liberty Brands, L.C., Liggett Group, Inc., M/S Dhanraj International, Inc., Pacific Stanford Manufacturing Corporation, Peter Stokkeby International A.S., P.T. Djarum, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc., Sherman 1400 Broadway NYC, Inc., Top Tobacco, L.P., Virginia Carolina Corporation, Inc., Von Eicken Group, and Wind River Tobacco Company, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
742 N.W.2d 118, 480 Mich. 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-general-v-philip-morris-usa-mich-2007.