Attorney General v. Mayor of New Bedford

128 Mass. 312, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 73
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 27, 1880·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

We have grave doubts whether a writ of mandamus can be granted to the mayor now that the term of office which he held at the time of filing the petition has expired. United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604. Commissioners v. Sellew, 99 U. S. 624. And we are quite clear that in a case in which no one but the incumbent was claiming the office of chief of police, and while an information was pending to try his title to that office, it cannot be said to have been erroneous, in matter of law, to refuse a writ of mandamus to the mayor to make a new nomination. Oakes v. Hill, 8 Pick. 47. Strong’s case, 20 Pick. 484, 497. Ellis v. County Commissioners, 2 Gray, 370, 375. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney General v. Mayor of New Bedford, 128 Mass. 312, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 73 (Mass. 1880).

128 Mass. 312 (Attorney General v. Mayor of New Bedford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Selectmen of Tewksbury
79 N.E.2d 1 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
State ex rel. Silsbee v. Boyce
43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 46 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)