Attorney General v. Mayor of New Bedford

128 Mass. 312, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 73
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 27, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 128 Mass. 312 (Attorney General v. Mayor of New Bedford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney General v. Mayor of New Bedford, 128 Mass. 312, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 73 (Mass. 1880).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

We have grave doubts whether a writ of mandamus can be granted to the mayor now that the term of office which he held at the time of filing the petition has expired. United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604. Commissioners v. Sellew, 99 U. S. 624. And we are quite clear that in a case in which no one but the incumbent was claiming the office of chief of police, and while an information was pending to try his title to that office, it cannot be said to have been erroneous, in matter of law, to refuse a writ of mandamus to the mayor to make a new nomination. Oakes v. Hill, 8 Pick. 47. Strong’s case, 20 Pick. 484, 497. Ellis v. County Commissioners, 2 Gray, 370, 375. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Selectmen of Tewksbury
79 N.E.2d 1 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
State ex rel. Silsbee v. Boyce
43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 46 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 Mass. 312, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-general-v-mayor-of-new-bedford-mass-1880.