Attorney General v. Flint City Council

Michigan Supreme Court

Attorney General v. Flint City Council

712 N.W.2d 504, 474 Mich. 1130

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 28, 2006

Docket130384

StatusPublished

This text of 712 N.W.2d 504 (Attorney General v. Flint City Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney General v. Flint City Council, 712 N.W.2d 504, 474 Mich. 1130 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

712 N.W.2d 504 (2006) 474 Mich. 1130

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FLINT CITY COUNCIL, Peggy R. Cook, Ed Taylor, Scott Kincaid, Johnnie Coleman, Carolyn Sims, Mark A. Horrigan, and Darryl E. Buchanan, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket Nos. 130384 & (70). COA No. 263618.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to withdraw application is also considered, and it is GRANTED, with the exception of the request for costs, which is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

712 N.W.2d 504 (2006) 474 Mich. 1130

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FLINT CITY COUNCIL, Peggy R. Cook, Ed Taylor, Scott Kincaid, Johnnie Coleman, Carolyn Sims, Mark A. Horrigan, and Darryl E. Buchanan, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket Nos. 130384 & (70). COA No. 263618.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to withdraw application is also considered, and it is GRANTED, with the exception of the request for costs, which is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 N.W.2d 504, 474 Mich. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-general-v-flint-city-council-mich-2006.

Opinion

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FLINT CITY COUNCIL, Peggy R. Cook, Ed Taylor, Scott Kincaid, Johnnie Coleman, Carolyn Sims, Mark A. Horrigan, and Darryl E. Buchanan, Defendants-Appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FLINT CITY COUNCIL, Peggy R. Cook, Ed Taylor, Scott Kincaid, Johnnie Coleman, Carolyn Sims, Mark A. Horrigan, and Darryl E. Buchanan, Defendants-Appellants.