Attorney General v. Division of Corrections

West Virginia Court of Claims

Attorney General v. Division of Corrections

23 Ct. Cl. 306

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 30, 2001

DocketCC-00-487

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Ct. Cl. 306 (Attorney General v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney General v. Division of Corrections, 23 Ct. Cl. 306 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim w as s ubmitted f or de cisión b ased u pon t he a negations in t he Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $25,518.50 for professional services rendered to respondent. The documentation for these services was not processed for payment within the appropriate fiscal year; therefore, claimant has not [307]*307been paid. In its Amended Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim, but states that the correct amount owed to claimant is $19,829.75. Respondent further states t hat t here w ere s ufScient f unds e xpired in t he a ppropriate f iscal y ear f rom which the invoices could have been paid. Claimant has reviewed the Amended Answer and agrees that the amount of $19,829.75 is the correct amount owed by respondent.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to claimant in the amount of $19,829.75.

Award of $19,829.75.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim w as s ubmitted f or de cisión b ased u pon t he a negations in t he Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $25,518.50 for professional services rendered to respondent. The documentation for these services was not processed for payment within the appropriate fiscal year; therefore, claimant has not [307]*307been paid. In its Amended Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim, but states that the correct amount owed to claimant is $19,829.75. Respondent further states t hat t here w ere s ufScient f unds e xpired in t he a ppropriate f iscal y ear f rom which the invoices could have been paid. Claimant has reviewed the Amended Answer and agrees that the amount of $19,829.75 is the correct amount owed by respondent.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to claimant in the amount of $19,829.75.

Award of $19,829.75.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Ct. Cl. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-general-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-2001.