Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports·Decided May 27, 1997·Published

Opinion

John D. LaFaver, Secretary Kansas Department of Revenue 915 S.W. Harrison Street Topeka, Kansas 66612-1588

Dear Secretary LaFaver:

You request our opinion regarding the authority of the Post Auditor to request, and the Department of Revenue to disclose, state income tax returns and return information. You explain that the Post Auditor's request was made pursuant to K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 79-3234. You are concerned that the exception from confidentiality cited by the Post Auditor does not apply under the circumstances because the audit for which the records are requested is not of the Department of Revenue. In your opinion, the Department and its employees are restricted from providing the records and information requested under K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 79-3234(e), the secrecy oath signed by Department employees pursuant to Department policy, and 26 U.S.C.A. § 6103(a).

K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 79-3234 provides in part as follows:

"(b) Except in accordance with proper judicial order, or as provided in subsection (c) or in K.S.A. 17-7511, subsection (g) of K.S.A. 46-1106, K.S.A. 46-1114, or K.S.A. 79-32,153a, and amendments thereto, it shall be unlawful for the director, any deputy, agent, clerk or other officer, employee or former employee of the department of revenue or any other state officer or employee or former state officer or employee to divulge, or to make known in any way, the amount of income or any particulars set forth or disclosed in any report, return, federal return or federal return information required under this act; . . .

"(c) . . . Nothing in this section shall prohibit the post auditor from access to all income tax reports or returns in accordance with and subject to the provisions of subsection (g) of K.S.A. 46-1106 or K.S.A. 46-1114, and amendments thereto. . . . Any person receiving any information under the provisions of this subsection shall be subject to the confidentiality provisions of subsection (b) and to the penalty provisions of subsection (d).

"(d) Any violation of subsection (b) or (c) is a class B misdemeanor and, if the offender is an officer or employee of the state, such officer or employee shall be dismissed from office.

"(e) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the secretary of revenue may permit the commissioner of internal revenue of the United States, or the proper official of any state imposing an income tax, or the authorized representative of either, to inspect the income tax returns made under this act and the secretary may make available or furnish to [such officials], or their authorized representatives, information contained in income tax reports or returns . . . but such information shall not be used for any other purpose than that of the administration of tax laws of such state, the state of Kansas or the United States. . . ." (Emphasis added).

The above-quoted provision clearly excepts from its prohibition disclosure of information in accordance with and subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 46-1106(g) or K.S.A. 46-1114. K.S.A. 46-1106(g) provides in part:

"In the discharge of the duties imposed under the legislative post audit act, the post auditor . . . shall have access to all books, accounts, records, files, documents and correspondence, confidential or otherwise, of any person or state agency subject to the legislative post audit act or in the custody of any such person or state agency. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the post auditor . . . and all employees and former employees of the division of post audit . . . shall be subject to the same duty of confidentiality imposed by law on any such person or state agency with regard to any such books, accounts, records, files, documents and correspondence, and any information contained therein, and shall be subject to any civil or criminal penalties imposed by law for violations of such duty of confidentiality. . . . Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to supersede any requirement of federal law."

K.S.A. 46-1114 provides similar access for the Post Auditor when directed by the Legislative Post Audit Committee to make an audit of "any records or matters of any person specified in this section." K.S.A. 46-1114(a). For audits conducted under this provision, the Post Auditor's access to records is subject to the restrictions in K.S.A. 46-1114(d).

K.S.A. 46-1106(g) gives the Post Auditor access to records needed to "discharge the duties imposed under the legislative post audit act." It is our understanding that the income tax records in question are being requested for an audit of a state agency conducted under K.S.A. 46-1108. Because the conduct of an audit under K.S.A. 46-1108 is a duty imposed under the Legislative Post Audit Act, the provisions of K.S.A. 46-1106(g) apply. See K.S.A. 46-1119.

While K.S.A. 46-1106(g) imposes on the Post Auditor and her employees the same duty of confidentiality imposed by law on the Department of Revenue and its employees with regard to income tax returns, we do not believe this prevents the Post Auditor from accessing state income tax returns when auditing a person or entity other than the Department. The language you reference in subsection (e) of K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 79-3234 is not a confidentiality provision, but rather a restriction on use of information obtained by the United States or another state pursuant to that subsection. Indeed, K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 79-3234(c) refers to subsection (b) as its confidentiality provision, not subsection (e). Further, Department policy requiring employee compliance with a secrecy oath cannot overcome the statutory authority of the Post Auditor to access Department records.

The provisions allowing the Post Auditor access to records of state agencies like the Department do not limit such access to situations where the audit is of the agency having custody of the records. Rather, when necessary to perform an authorized audit under K.S.A.46-1108, K.S.A. 46-1106(g) allows access to records, confidential or otherwise, "of any person or state agency subject to the legislative post audit act" and to records, confidential or otherwise, "in the custody ofany such person or state agency." (Emphasis added).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney General Opinion No., (kanag 1997).

Attorney General Opinion No. (Attorney General Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stokwitz v. United States
831 F.2d 893 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Ungaro v. Desert Palace, Inc.
732 F. Supp. 1522 (D. Nevada, 1989)