Attorney-General Ex Rel. Putnam v. Fogarty
63 A. 219, 73 N.H. 607, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 85
This text of 63 A. 219 (Attorney-General Ex Rel. Putnam v. Fogarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Attorney-General Ex Rel. Putnam v. Fogarty, 63 A. 219, 73 N.H. 607, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 85 (N.H. 1905).
Opinion
The agreed case contains no provision for judgment and presents merely a moot question. Such questions are not considered in the absence of special reason therefor. Conn. Valley Lumber Co. v. Monroe, 71 N. H. 478. No reason for an exception to the general rule is perceived in this case.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Connecticut Valley Lumber Co. v. Monroe
52 A. 940 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 A. 219, 73 N.H. 607, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-general-ex-rel-putnam-v-fogarty-nh-1905.