Attorney-General Ex Rel. Putnam v. Fogarty
63 A. 219, 73 N.H. 607, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 85
Opinion
The agreed case contains no provision for judgment and presents merely a moot question. Such questions are not considered in the absence of special reason therefor. Conn. Valley Lumber Co. v. Monroe, 71 N. H. 478. No reason for an exception to the general rule is perceived in this case.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney-General Ex Rel. Putnam v. Fogarty, 63 A. 219, 73 N.H. 607, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 85 (N.H. 1905).
63 A. 219 (Attorney-General Ex Rel. Putnam v. Fogarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Connecticut Valley Lumber Co. v. Monroe
52 A. 940 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)