Attorney General Ex Rel. Barr v. Kent County Clerk

Michigan Court of Appeals

Attorney General Ex Rel. Barr v. Kent County Clerk

206 N.W.2d 475, 45 Mich. App. 406, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1115

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 23, 1973

DocketDocket 15059

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 N.W.2d 475 (Attorney General Ex Rel. Barr v. Kent County Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney General Ex Rel. Barr v. Kent County Clerk, 206 N.W.2d 475, 45 Mich. App. 406, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1115 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On December 14, 1970, the Register of Deeds of Kent County died, creating a vacancy in the office. The vacancy could have been filled by appointment for the remainder of the unexpired term by defendants County Clerk, Judge of Probate, and Prosecuting Attorney of the county. 1 There was no such appointment, however, and on February 3, 1971, the Kent County Board of Commissioners adopted a resolution providing for a merger of the offices of County Clerk and Register of Deeds. Defendant County Clerk assumed the duties of the Register of . Deeds and was thereafter elected to a new term for the combined offices at the general election held November 7, 1972.

Plaintiffs instituted this action as a quo warranto inquiry into the right of defendant clerk to hold the office of Register of Deeds and for mandamus to compel the appointment of a Register of Deeds to fill the claimed vacancy in that office. From a summary judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

The action was not commenced until March 22, 1972, more than 13 months after the action of the county board. It is barred by laches and is, in any event, now moot since the term of the office inquired into has expired and there is no other claimant to the office for such expired term. Layle v Adjutant General of Michigan, 384 Mich 638 (1971), and cases cited therein.

Affirmed, without costs, a public question being involved.

1

MCLA 201.35; MSA 6.715

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On December 14, 1970, the Register of Deeds of Kent County died, creating a vacancy in the office. The vacancy could have been filled by appointment for the remainder of the unexpired term by defendants County Clerk, Judge of Probate, and Prosecuting Attorney of the county. 1 There was no such appointment, however, and on February 3, 1971, the Kent County Board of Commissioners adopted a resolution providing for a merger of the offices of County Clerk and Register of Deeds. Defendant County Clerk assumed the duties of the Register of . Deeds and was thereafter elected to a new term for the combined offices at the general election held November 7, 1972.

Plaintiffs instituted this action as a quo warranto inquiry into the right of defendant clerk to hold the office of Register of Deeds and for mandamus to compel the appointment of a Register of Deeds to fill the claimed vacancy in that office. From a summary judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

The action was not commenced until March 22, 1972, more than 13 months after the action of the county board. It is barred by laches and is, in any event, now moot since the term of the office inquired into has expired and there is no other claimant to the office for such expired term. Layle v Adjutant General of Michigan, 384 Mich 638 (1971), and cases cited therein.

Affirmed, without costs, a public question being involved.

1

MCLA 201.35; MSA 6.715

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 N.W.2d 475, 45 Mich. App. 406, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-general-ex-rel-barr-v-kent-county-clerk-michctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack