Attoram Realty Corp. v. Town of Greenburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Attoram Realty Corp. v. Town of Greenburgh

8 A.D.2d 937, 190 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7675

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 937 (Attoram Realty Corp. v. Town of Greenburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attoram Realty Corp. v. Town of Greenburgh, 8 A.D.2d 937, 190 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from, a judgment, entered after trial before an Official Referee, decreeing that the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Greenburgh and the map incorporated therein are null and void insofar as they affect respondent’s real property. The property, which is in a “R-10” residence zone, has an area of about 12 acres, with a frontage of approximately 750 feet on the east side of Saw Mill River Road, as relocated, and a depth of approximately 550 feet. The Referee found that, as a practical matter, the subject property could not be economically used either for one-family residences or for any of the other uses specially permitted under various restrictions and conditions as allowed by the provisions of the ordinance. The appellant’s principal contention is that respondent’s financial burden in submitting to less desirable use of its property should not be permitted to disturb the legislative judgment exercised in the zoning of the property. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from, a judgment, entered after trial before an Official Referee, decreeing that the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Greenburgh and the map incorporated therein are null and void insofar as they affect respondent’s real property. The property, which is in a “R-10” residence zone, has an area of about 12 acres, with a frontage of approximately 750 feet on the east side of Saw Mill River Road, as relocated, and a depth of approximately 550 feet. The Referee found that, as a practical matter, the subject property could not be economically used either for one-family residences or for any of the other uses specially permitted under various restrictions and conditions as allowed by the provisions of the ordinance. The appellant’s principal contention is that respondent’s financial burden in submitting to less desirable use of its property should not be permitted to disturb the legislative judgment exercised in the zoning of the property. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 937, 190 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attoram-realty-corp-v-town-of-greenburgh-nyappdiv-1959.