ATTIDORE v. Government of the Virgin Islands

Virgin Islands

ATTIDORE v. Government of the Virgin Islands

291 F. Supp. 2d 379, 1994 WL 16040251, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21668

CourtDistrict Court, Virgin Islands

DecidedApril 11, 1994

DocketD.C. CRIM.APP.NO. 93. T.C. CRIM.NO. F369-9

StatusPublished

This text of 291 F. Supp. 2d 379 (ATTIDORE v. Government of the Virgin Islands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ATTIDORE v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 291 F. Supp. 2d 379, 1994 WL 16040251, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21668 (vid 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

MOORE, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on appeal from the Territorial Court of the Virgin Islands, having been submitted on the briefs without oral argument. Appellant challenges the Territorial Court’s jury instruction regarding the burden of proof regarding appellant’s sanity and capacity to commit the crime. After due consideration,

IT IS on this _11_ day of April, 1994, hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the Territorial Court is AFFIRMED 1

1

. The Territorial Court instructed the jury that there exists "a presumption that every person is sane; however, where some evidence of insanity has been introduced, then that presumption disappears from the case and the burden is then on the Government to prove that the offense was not a consequence of that mental illness of the Defendant”. In his brief, appellant inaccurately stated that "[sjuch instruction unfairly and improperly directed the jury to place the burden of sanity upon the Defendant by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” Brief for Appellant at 11. This Court is offended by the misleading portrayal of the record, and counsel is warned that future filings with similar blatent mistate-ments may subject counsel to sanctions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

MOORE, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on appeal from the Territorial Court of the Virgin Islands, having been submitted on the briefs without oral argument. Appellant challenges the Territorial Court’s jury instruction regarding the burden of proof regarding appellant’s sanity and capacity to commit the crime. After due consideration,

IT IS on this _11_ day of April, 1994, hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the Territorial Court is AFFIRMED 1

1

. The Territorial Court instructed the jury that there exists "a presumption that every person is sane; however, where some evidence of insanity has been introduced, then that presumption disappears from the case and the burden is then on the Government to prove that the offense was not a consequence of that mental illness of the Defendant”. In his brief, appellant inaccurately stated that "[sjuch instruction unfairly and improperly directed the jury to place the burden of sanity upon the Defendant by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” Brief for Appellant at 11. This Court is offended by the misleading portrayal of the record, and counsel is warned that future filings with similar blatent mistate-ments may subject counsel to sanctions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 F. Supp. 2d 379, 1994 WL 16040251, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attidore-v-government-of-the-virgin-islands-vid-1994.