Attica Bros. v. Ball
This text of 43 A.D.2d 790 (Attica Bros. v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application denied and proceeding dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners are not entitled to the relief sought under CPLR 7803 (see Matter of Finnerty v. McDowell, 36 A D 2d 900). The record does not demonstrate that Justice Moore in Special Term failed to perform a duty enjoined upon him by law, that he proceeded without or in excess of jurisdiction or that his determination was made in violation of lawful procedure, was affected by an error of law or was arbitrary or capricious or an abuse of discretion. A determination as to the propriety of a transfer of individual petitioners to the detention facilities provided in Erie County can better be made when the imminence of trial of various indictments can be shown. As correctly pointed out by Justice Moore in his decision and order of September 27, 1973, the denial to petitioners of the relief sought does not preclude the individual petitioners from making application to Special Term for an order that the individual be transferred to the Brie County Jail. (Article 78 proceeding to compel transfer of petitioners to Erie County Jail.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A.D.2d 790, 350 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attica-bros-v-ball-nyappdiv-1973.