Attia v. Koelling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Attia v. Koelling

9 A.D.2d 867, 192 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6217

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 867 (Attia v. Koelling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attia v. Koelling, 9 A.D.2d 867, 192 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We do not interpret the direction to state the number of visits (o physicians as requiring the names of physicians. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Onondaga Special Term precluding plaintiff from giving certain testimony unless he specified more particularly in answer to a demand for a bill of particulars.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We do not interpret the direction to state the number of visits (o physicians as requiring the names of physicians. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Onondaga Special Term precluding plaintiff from giving certain testimony unless he specified more particularly in answer to a demand for a bill of particulars.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 867, 192 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attia-v-koelling-nyappdiv-1959.