Attea v. Attea

New York Court of Appeals

Attea v. Attea

860 N.E.2d 58, 7 N.Y.3d 879, 826 N.Y.S.2d 596

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 860 N.E.2d 58 (Attea v. Attea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attea v. Attea, 860 N.E.2d 58, 7 N.Y.3d 879, 826 N.Y.S.2d 596 (N.Y. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs. Defendant father did not agree to pay the disputed medical school expenses for the parties’ youngest son (see Hoffman v Hoffman, 122 AD2d 583, 584 [4th Dept 1986], lv dismissed 69 NY2d 706 [1986]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur; Judge Pigott taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI