Home/New York Court of Appeals/Attea v. Attea

Attea v. Attea

860 N.E.2d 58, 7 N.Y.3d 879, 826 N.Y.S.2d 596
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2006·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs. Defendant father did not agree to pay the disputed medical school expenses for the parties’ youngest son (see Hoffman v Hoffman, 122 AD2d 583, 584 [4th Dept 1986], lv dismissed 69 NY2d 706 [1986]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur; Judge Pigott taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attea v. Attea, 860 N.E.2d 58, 7 N.Y.3d 879, 826 N.Y.S.2d 596 (N.Y. 2006).

860 N.E.2d 58 (Attea v. Attea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sinnott v. Sinnott
2021 NY Slip Op 03073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Lewis v. Lewis
144 A.D.3d 1659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Levenglick v. Levenglick
140 A.D.3d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Fleming v. Fleming
137 A.D.3d 1206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Gay v. Gay
118 A.D.3d 1331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Weinschneider v. Weinschneider
50 A.D.3d 1128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Rosenberg v. METLIFE, INC.
859 N.E.2d 915 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)