Attaway v. Weaver

166 S.E. 192, 175 Ga. 771, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 325
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 12, 1932
DocketNo. 8838
StatusPublished

This text of 166 S.E. 192 (Attaway v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attaway v. Weaver, 166 S.E. 192, 175 Ga. 771, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 325 (Ga. 1932).

Opinion

Hill, J.

Only the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and the ground that the court did not correctly state the issues of the case to the jury, were argued. The other grounds of the motion were not mentioned, ánd are considered abandoned. On examination of the record it is held that the charge of the court is not subject to the criticism that it did not correctly state the issues involved in the ease. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, Q. J., who dissents, and Atkinson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 S.E. 192, 175 Ga. 771, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attaway-v-weaver-ga-1932.