Attaway v. Weaver
This text of 166 S.E. 192 (Attaway v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Only the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and the ground that the court did not correctly state the issues of the case to the jury, were argued. The other grounds of the motion were not mentioned, ánd are considered abandoned. On examination of the record it is held that the charge of the court is not subject to the criticism that it did not correctly state the issues involved in the ease. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 S.E. 192, 175 Ga. 771, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attaway-v-weaver-ga-1932.